I’m just amazed by how friendly people are here. On Thursday, my friend Jackie and I went to the Wine Festival in Novi Sad’s Old Town. Approximately fifty vineyards and wine distributors were represented at this festival. Jackie and I stopped at the table of a Bačka Palanka (pronounced “Bahtchka”) vineyard. As we were talking about what wine we should try first, an older man grabbed my elbow. I turned, and he poured me a glass of a red wine called Vermet. I’m not sure if this wine is available in the U.S., but if it is, you really must try it. Vermet is a sweet red wine made with cloves. It’s kind of like mulled wine, except tastier. Jackie and I talked with Koŝta (pronounced Kohshta) for a while. He didn’t have any Vermet for sale at the festival, so I asked him where one could purchase it. “Bačka Palanka isn’t far from here. Just give me a call and I’ll drop the wine off at your door.”
Wow. I doubt winesellers in the U.S. are willing to do this. Bačka Palanka is 45 minutes from Novi Sad.
Jackie wanted to try a wine called Francuska (we spent most of the festival looking for wines we’d never heard of), but Koŝta didn’t have it available for tasting. So he just gave her a free bottle! We tried to give him some money for it, but he refused. We promised to come visit his winery next weekend, so I could purchase Vermet, and so we could speak with him further.
This kind of friendliness and hospitality is not something that I’m used to. In the United States, it seems like everything has its cost. Strangers never offer other strangers free bottles of wine. One thing I’ve noticed about people in Serbia is that they seem to really want to make sure that visitors to the country are having a good time. And, if allowed to talk on the subject, will attempt to explain the events of the late 1990s in a manner that doesn’t paint Serbia in such a negative light.
I’ll write more on this a little later.
We packed our bags on Friday and went on a weekend excursion to Bukovac, a village (selo) near Valjevo. On the way, we stopped in Brankovima, to visit an old church and see the grave of Serbian poet Desna Marković. We also stopped in Valjevo, at the national museum. I found quite a bit of rich “primary source data” at this second stop. The museum showcases an exhibition of Serbian history and culture — from prehistory to the WWII era. I found their descriptions of the events of the 19th century pretty interesting. For those of you who aren’t history geeks, the 19th century was the time period when nationalist movements were beginning to flower in Central and Eastern Europe. Serbia gained its independence from the Ottoman Empire in 1878, and had a major role in the Balkan Wars of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and in World War I. (The man who shot Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo was a Bosnian Serb.) I took special note of any “nationalist” language in the museum, of which there was a lot. Most telling, the 1912 Balkan War was referred to as “Revenged Kosovo.” During this war, Serbia marched into Kosovo (which was still under the Ottoman Empire), and took it as Serbian territory. This angered many (Slavic and non-Slavic) people living in Kosovo at the time — they didn’t really want to live under Serbia, according to historian Noel Malcolm.” I found the title “Revenged Kosovo” pretty interesting — good source data for my master’s thesis.
After that, we drove into the mountains, to Bukovac. Bukovac is a traditional Serbian village. Inhabitants subsist via farming the land. The village is a collection of five ranch-type houses. The “house” in which we stayed actually consisted of five structures — two sleeping houses, one cookhouse, one dining hall, and a barn. The house’s owners, Vlada, Marina, and their two children Slavko and Natasa, met us at the gate with rakija. It is a tradition in Serbia to be welcomed into the home with something warm (bread), something hot (rakija — strong Serbian brandy), and something sweet (honey or jam). After taking our rakija shots, we went into the dining house for “lunch.”
This is not what we in the U.S. typically think of as “lunch.” In Serbia, lunch is served at three or four in the afternoon. And lunch is a four-course meal. We ate bread with kajmak (a cross between cheese and butter), a tomato-cucumber salad, soup, sarma (cabbage rolls), and a sweet cake for dessert. Needless to say, I was stuffed.
The family spoke nothing but Serbian. After dinner, Slavko and Natasa took us into the hills for a sunset walk. They chattered the whole way, teaching us the names for fruits, vegetables, animals — and the Serbian word for cow poop. I started calling the kids “little professors,” a nickname which they really seemed to like. We picked plums from trees and ate them. At the top of the hill, we paused for pictures and sunset.
The Valjevo region in Serbia is quite lovely — pastoral, hilly, and green. When I thought of rural Serbia, that landscape was exactly what I pictured. I didn’t realize Serbia is so hilly, and so beautiful. Again, I promise pictures.
We relaxed the entire weekend. On Saturday, we drove to a church in the hills. Vlado told us that the Serbs had hidden the church so well that the Turks couldn’t find it. The church was small, with very interesting paintings and woodcarvings in the tower. A professor from Belgrade (and member of the Serbian Academy of Arts and Sciences) came with us, telling us Serbian myths and folktales about water and water creatures. Apparently, in Serbian folk culture, demons live near the water.
Later that night, Natasa took a couple of kids, Elizabeth (one of the other students) and I on a walk with the sheep. This ended up being quite the adventure. On the way up, our group of sheep ran into another group of sheep. And when two groups of sheep collide…well, they act like sheep. They all stood together in the center of the road, one big mass of sheep. We had no idea what to do. Natasa managed to get half the sheep to go up the hill, but she was missing one of them. The older woman leading the other set of sheep grabbed one of her sheep by the leg, forcibly separating it from the group. But the poor sheep didn’t want to go with our sheep. When the woman let go, the sheep ran back to the woman’s herd. I guess sheep don’t go places by themselves, and our sheep were too far away for this sheep to join up with them. Natasa drove the sheep back down the hill. Together, the two children, Elizabeth, and I blocked the exit points for the sheep. The only place the woman’s sheep could run was with us. Eventually, we gathered all of our rightful sheep up and led them to pasture.
While at the pasture, while we were sitting and talking, the sheep wandered up. After thirty minutes or so, Natasa stands up and asks “Where are the sheep?” We had lost the sheep!!! She, Elizabeth, and one of the kids hiked up the hill after the sheep. The other kid and I waited at the bottom of the hill, guarding the potato patch. Eventually, the sheep wandered down the hill, grazing. Natasa and Elizabeth were pretty far behind them. They’d left word with us not to let the sheep eat the potatoes. Slavko came into the pasture, saw that I had my camera out, and immediately ran over to take some pictures. (He played with our cameras all weekend.) While Slavko was taking pictures, the sheep mozied into the potato patch. I saw this, and went running, yelling “Hajde sheep! Hajde!” (This means go away.) Elizabeth said that I looked pretty funny, running into the potato patch with my hands over my head, yelling at the top of my lungs at the sheep. When they got down the hill, Natasa looked at me and said “Good job, Anna!” We started back down the hill towards home.
Moral of the story — herding sheep is harder than it looks.
On Sunday, I managed to get some time with the Belgrade professor. I asked him to tell the story of Prince Lazar, the so-called “hero” of the Kosovo battle. (Lazar was beheaded, the Serbs basically lost the battle, and interpret this as the beginning of 500 years of Ottoman domination.) After telling the story of Lazar, unprompted, the professor gave me what I interpret as the Serbian nationalist version of the history of Kosovo. He said that we shouldn’t blame what happened in Kosovo solely on Milosevic — there had been uprisings in the region for at least twenty years prior to the 1980s. He said that, during WWII, Kosovo had been under Albanian facists. (This isn’t quite true — Kosovo was ruled by Italian facists during WWII. However, I do think Albania was heavily involved. I need to go back to my history books to double-check this.) He said that one of the reasons why so many Serbs had left Kosovo was due to the differential treatment of Albanians and Serbs during the Age of Enlightenment. Apparently crimes like rape were punished differently. (Again, I question this.)
Essentially, this professor was a Milosevic apologist. He said that the Croats started arming first, and this caused fear among Serbs living in Croatia. (Both sides started arming roughly around the same time.) Croatia was a facist state during WWII, and many Serbs died in concentration camps — not a lot of people outside of the region study this in their history textbooks. When Croatia declared its independence, Tudjman picked symbols of the Croatian facist state as the new country’s nationalist symbols. (These symbols remain on the Croatian flag.) So, according to the professor, Serbs in Croatia were “merely reacting to save their homes in Croatia.”
He said that Milosevic and Tudjman tried to negotiate to prevent conflict in Bosnia. These negotiations tried to define the ethnic surroundings in the former Yugoslavia, including the territory of Bosnia. The professor said “The agreement would have been successful had Serbs in Croatia not been afraid to live under Croat rule and if Western countries had accepted Tudjman and Milosevic’s division of Bosnia.” He didn’t say anything about the Bosnian Muslims, and whether or not they had a right to their own state. It was as though Serbs and Croats were the only constituent peoples in Bosnia, and therefore Milosevic and Tudjman had a right to divide that country between the two of them.
Later, someone asked the professor how long he’d been a member of the Serbian Academy of Arts and Sciences, and he responded “over twenty years.” This means that he was a member of the academy when the 1986 memorandum — considered the first statement of 1980s Serbian nationalism — was released. And he didn’t resign. That shows you his views right there.
I appreciate getting the Serbian perspective on the events, but in my opinion, people in the former Yugoslavia need to acknowledge what happened in order to move on. Croats need to acknowledge their (state supported) deeds against Serbs. (Jackie, one of my classmates, ended up talking to a Croatian Serb for a while. She said that in the 1990s, at the beginning of the Balkan Wars, Serbs in Croata just started disappearing. And nobody knows where they went. Members of families just vanished, never to be seen again.) Serbs need to acknowledge their state-supported violence towards Croats and Muslims, and particularly the massacre at Srebrenica. And Bosnian Muslims need to acknowledge that their army, too, is not blameless. Everyone did horrible things. Everyone shares in the blame. And only in this way can forgiveness occur.